Making kids less self disturbable? What does this mean? Aren’t people disturbed by things that happen to them? Don’t we hear ourselves and others say ‘it’ makes me mad when so and so happens? Wouldn’t the world be a better place if what’s her name was this way instead of that way? etc.
If we could make ‘it’ disappear then we’d all feel better
wouldn’t we? ''Please make it so that I will not be inconvenienced today and that my day
will be one free of discomfort and full of joy!'' we implore. We can wish this be the case but
can we guarantee it will be that way?
The problem is that inevitably we will experience discomfort in our day and how disturbed we make ourselves depend on what
we expect of our day in the first place. How do we view the events of the day?
Epictetus |
'Men are disturbed not by things, but by the view which they take of them.'
The students that come to see me are dealing with questions like; why must I do writing when I want to play on the ipad? Writing makes me mad why must I do it! Why is the teacher so mean, she won’t let me draw and she makes me mad. I’m so dumb and hopeless. You get the picture don’t you? Don’t I? Don’t they?
No they don’t and that is why they present with self
defeating, debilitating feelings of anger, anxiety, shame and depression. Please
make writing disappear! Please make the teacher let me do what I want when I
want to! Please take ‘it’ away and then and only then can I feel OK!
'The universe doesn’t care about you, it’s not for or against you, it just doesn’t give a shit.'
Albert Ellis
If Epictetus and Ellis are right and we can’t make ‘it’
disappear then is there another way to deal with challenge and adversity,
discomfort, failure and rejection? Why are these children disturbed if it isn’t
‘it’ causing them to be? Is there another cause; another factor or factors at
work here?
Albert Ellis said that schools and educators could help
children learn how to be less disturbable when things don’t go so well. He
argues that as constructivists we have all developed our own habits of thinking
(beliefs) and these mostly unconscious personal philosophies determine how
strong we may respond to events and happenings.
- I must absolutely get what I believe I must have!
- She must be my friend (she is such a louse/I am such a loser)!
- I must always get an A for my assignments (if I don’t I’m a loser)!
- It’s unfair when things don’t go my way (as they should)!
'If I were a young scientist today, I would still do immunisation. But instead of immunising kids physically, I’d do it your way. I’d immunise them psychologically. I’d see if these psychologically immunised kids could then fight off mental illness better. Physical illness too.'
Ellis tells us that poor mental health is not
so much a consequence of the ‘outside it’ but more to do with the ‘inside it!’
Children (and us) are making ourselves disturbed because of what we believe
about ourselves, others and life in general. If children can learn how their
thinking, feeling and behaving are linked they then have a way to begin to work
out how to manage themselves more effectively i.e. so they make themselves less
disturbed and more able to handle challenge, discomfort etc. This is what Salk meant about psychologically immunising children with the means to see things in a rational way. Ellis gives us this opportunity through Rational Emotive Behaviour Education and educators are taking heed!
A growing number of schools in South Australia are teaching
students how as constructivists they ‘make’ ‘build’ ‘construct’ the ‘thinking
rules’ that underpin how they feel and how they behave through Rational Emotive
Behaviour Education. They are taught to:
- Identify what they believe
- Decide whether they are helpful (rational) or unhelpful (irrational) beliefs
- Challenge, change and replace errant habits of thinking with more helpful (rational) ones
- Practise, practise, practise until old habits of thinking are replaced with new ones (automatic helpful thinking feeling and behaving)