Skip to main content

Have a Go Spaghettio! A closer look at D of The ABC of REBT

 

Ms Smithers is determined to teach her young constructivist learners that habits of thinking can be healthy and helpful or unhealthy and unhelpful. She want’s to focus on the D part of the ABC DE of REBT counselling paradigm that she is learning about. This is the part where we ask the question How do you know? And what have you left out?

What do we mean when we say, ‘My friend is mean!’ How do you know? And what have you missed out.

Ms Smithers has compiled a list of expressions, utterances made by children in her class. Here are some:

He’s dumb!

I can’t do this!

No one likes me.

These are discussed and referred to often as Ms Smithers wants to promote a discourse that points to examining what we mean, explaining how we justify our meanings and exploring how what’s left out can challenge what we mean and form new and more accurate meanings. That’s the Have a Go Spaghettio! Way!

Ms Smithers says, “When children present with behaviours and emotions that suggest that Brain Bully thinking’s at work, I help them to identify what it is that’s driving their e.g., anxiety or sadness. Once identified we then talk about the evidence that challenges or DISPUTES the veracity of what Brain Bully is saying. This is the D part of the ABC (DE) Theory of Emotional Disturbance. Change our thinking and change how we feel and act. Helpful thinking is Brain Friend or Success Helper thinking. This is done as a matter of course when, e.g., we are considering 3rd party characters like Franklin the Turtle in Franklin’s Bad Day.”

Ms Smithers will refer to the class Emotional Thermometer to identify emotions and strength of emotions. She will invite children to consider where a happening might rate on the Catastrophe Scale. This challenges the view that something might be worse than it need be. Brain Bully thinking makes Brain Bully feelings and actions.

Ms Smithers says “As a group we will revisit situations familiar to students as with Franklins Bad Day. We will identify what happened (A) how Franklin felt and acted (C) in response to A, and question Franklin’s mindset at B, what thinking are we suggesting might be driving how Franklin is feeling at C. We have previously determined that Franklin was engaging Brain Bully thinking that was causing Franklin’s extreme upset at C. So, what do we do? Let’s consider the veracity of Franklin’s thinking as B and help him modify what he thinks and therefore how he feels and behaves. This endeavour will remind us all that the belief constructions we make, Brain Friend/Succes Helper and Brain Bully/Success Stopper thinking is linked to how we feel and behave.

“Franklin’s best friend Otter moved away. He felt sad, angry and became aggressive.

This unhelpful and uncharacteristic disposition the children say in the first instance is because Otter moved away and Franklin will only feel OK if Otter comes back. They say he thinks, ‘I can’t be happy. This is not fair!’ But I’m trying to teach them that B has something to do with it. The children think that A makes C, that Franklin feels and acts as he does because A MAKES HIM THIS WAY! I want them to learn that A, what happens plus B, how A is interpreted makes C. We want Franklin to go from an A=C perspective, to a Brain Friend A +B=C perspective.

I ask the children:

 How do we know Franklin isn’t OK.

What does he mean when he thinks that things must be the same?

How does he know this?

What is he leaving out? What other possibilities are there?

Using the Verbal Pollution Free Zone principle of General Semantics, we talk about the evidence that may challenge the ‘how do you know what you think is true’ question.  All work in progress.”

Classroom discourse focuses on the six Success Have a Go Spaghettio! Helper capabilities. We talk about the think – feel – do connection of Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. We set ourselves SH goals and work to reach them. We practice unconditional self, other and life acceptance. We say together each day that making a mistake doesn’t make us mistakes! We look out for Brain Bully thinking, and we challenge it to change it to Brain Friend thinking. And we sing the Have a Go Spaghettio! song! Don’t we Ms Buzz.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grieving the Loss of Self When Narcissistic Feed Dries Up

Professor Sam Vaknin is an authority on narcissistic personality disorder. His videos are informative and well communicated which helped my understanding of this condition. A narcissists  'feed' dries up when the supply of others adulation and affirmation withers and stops. A crisis ensues when the narcissist realises that incoming approval has diminished and their idealised self is under attack. The contrived and carefully constructed 'self' is no longer acknowledged and valued by external sources. They cease 'to be' because the sources feeding their self sees through the narcissists grandiose and phony veneer. (see  Ms. Prudence Putty-Nose  ) The self they have concocted and which demands the positive regard and affirmation of those they have trained to adore them, is but an irrational virtual representation of the real world. There's a disparity between the narcissists version of reality and how things really are, projecting a world of fantasy replayed on...

APPROVALISM – the philosophy of the ‘love slob’

An approvalist is one who practices the philosophy of Approvalism. An approvalist lives life for the service of others seemingly without thought for self, ministering to the needs of others, making life ‘better’ for them. A good approvalist needs to do for others and her worth is measured according to how others view her and how helpful she can be to others. Approvalists say ‘yes’ to others demands and requests and are ultra sensitive to the needs of others (they must be rescued and saved). If they don’t perform to their own lofty expectations or (quelle catastrophe!) others don’t seem to value them (as they should) then they tend to harshly judge themselves as being ‘bad’ and may down themselves harshly! They will think, ‘I should have known that he needed support. I should have been there. I should have done better. I am a loser. It’s my fault he is in such a mess.’ They may also experience deep anger and direct it towards those ‘who do not appreciate me, after all shouldn’t they ...

Positive Psychology and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy

The ABC Theory of Emotional Disturbance illustrates how feelings and behaviour at C are determined by what happens at A and B i.e. what we believe (B) about what happens (A). This is an A+B=C philosophy. What happens when our constructed view of ourselves equates to an A=C way of believing e.g. failing at A makes me feel depressed at C and causes me to give up. An A=C philosophy ‘If I fail at A I feel really bad at C 'it' (A) makes me angry and sad’ is problematic for our less resilient kids because they are unaware that constructed beliefs at B have a lot to do with it! 
A is what happens e.g. 'someone has rejected me!' and C is how I feel and act in response to A e.g. 'I feel really sad because she has rejected me so I stay at home etc' The depth of despair and how long it lasts will depend on how self accepting the person is. If a child ‘needs’ the approval of others he/she is at risk of depression, anger, anxiety because...