Skip to main content

Have a go Spaghettio! and The ABC D&E of REBT – part 2


Have a Go Spaghettio! introduces the REBT theory of psychotherapy to the early childhood young constructivist. General Semantics also comes into play which says that the map is not the territory, the word is not the thing or person. Have a Go Spaghettio! teaches how to think in self-helpful, Brain Friend/Success Helper thinking ways via the ABC of REBT and General Semantics theory.

Ms Smithers is a Rational Emotive Behaviour Educator. She has learned about the ABC of REBT, and she wants her young constructivist learners to know all about it.

In the first presentation we considered the ABC of REBT, and how it informs the Have a Go Spaghettio! pedagogy. The idea is to take REBT from the rooms of the therapist specialist to the excitement and energy of the early childhood school and classroom settings. Albert Ellis said the future of psychotherapy was in the classroom and here we are! Good on you Ms Smithers!

 

Ms. Smithers

Slide 2 introduces to additional components of the ABC of REBT and that’s the D and E parts. So were back at school and Ms Smithers is about to introduce these two important additions to the ABC of REBT.

Ms Smithers teaches the children that A is an Adverse happening, something we don’t want to happen, that C is how we feel and behave as a consequence of the happening, A. This message becomes a feature of daily classroom discourse, as the Ms Smithers refers to things constantly like:

How do you feel?

I feel worried?

What happened?

What are/were you thinking?

What was Brain Bully saying?

I think BB is trying to give me a big headache!

Now what would Brain Friend say?

Etc.

This classroom chat, led by Ms Smithers, is reinforcing the ABC of REBT ideas, reminding children that:

Things happen.

We feel and act in response to what happens.

We interpret what’s happening, we think about it.

We question whether what we are thinking is true or not.

We reconsider, rethink, and reset what we think, to a Brain Friend/Success Helper/rational setting because we challenged the veracity of Brain Bully thinking at B, what we think.

Rethinking, reconsidering, challenging what we think is true is called DISPUTATION of irrational beliefs, the D of the ABC of REBT.

Ms Smithers hones her Have a Go Spaghettio! knowledge and practice as she becomes a competent Rational Emotive Behaviour Educator. And her students are learning about the ABC of REBT in their daily learning. She Has a Go Spaghettio!

In Ms. Smithers the classroom

In slide 3 we consider the thoughts of the children in presentation 1, where at B of the ABC of REBT, they thought:

I’m dumb!

I’m hopeless.

No one likes me.

I need them to like and approve of me, thought Ms Smithers about her colleagues.

D is the process of challenging or reviewing what we are thinking at B. In the classroom Ms Smithers might model this so:

“I feel sad girls and boys. Not just a little bit but a lot.” “Let’s check the ET,” says the children.

“You might ask did something happen? Who will ask me?” Says Ms Smithers.

“What am I thinking? Is it Brain Friend or Brain Bully thinking? “she continues.

Ms Smithers says, “I think people I like must like me and if they don’t it means I’m not likeable and no one likes me! But they don’t have to even if I’d like them to. I do have some friends which is OK. What do you think people?”

“Not everyone will like you Ms Smithers, but some do. We like you.”

“I feel better now because I’ve changed the way I think. My new thinking rule is I would like everyone to like me, but they don’t have to and that’s OK. And if some people don’t like me doesn’t mean I’m not OK. I will write that in my daily journal. Thanks everyone.”

This kind of modelling and classroom chatter is a constant reference to how we think, how we feel and act are connected.

So D is when we rethink dispute our BB thinking, question and challenge what might be Brain Bully thinking that is making BB feelings and BB behaviours.

Ms Smithers has been doing some homework and has learned about some questions she can introduce into classroom discourse. This set of questions suggested by General Semantics theory is used by Ms Smithers when talking to students about the ABC of REBT. She asks:

“What do you mean?” (when you say you’re dumb?)

“How do you know?” (why do you think this?)

“What have you left out?” (why things show you that this is not true)

The children hear this every day. Ms Smithers ‘gives it a try banana pie!’

Slide 4

But wait, there’s more! What does E represent? E is Effective new belief. Teacher Ms Smithers has identified that her Brain Bully belief that everyone should like her is not helpful. She has friends who do like her, and she is always OK. She feels better now. She knows when Brain Bully is at work because she begins to feel down and she says to the children, “I have to check my thinking. What are the three questions?”

 

They say in unison:

“What do you mean?

How do you know?

What have you left out?”

“Right on says Ms Smithers. Get lost Brain Bully,” she says.

“Get lost Brain Bully they all say.”

 

Ms Smithers used to think:

“I’m only OK if people I like, like me.”

She now thinks:

“I’m OK even if some people may not think I’m OK.”

She practices this belief and reminds herself daily and articulates her new way of thinking to the children aloud to communicate to them that:

“BB thinking makes BB feelings and behaviours.

I can change my BB thinking to Brain Friend thinking.

I can practice my BF thinking.”

 

Ms Smithers new Effective belief is, ‘I don’t need you to like me for me to like myself.’ In other words, Ms Smithers prefers rather demands that others should like her. She no longer believes that she needs others to like her for her to know she is OK.

“Remember to practice your ABC of REBT. Practice your Have a go Spaghettio! thinking!” Ms Withers says.

The ABC of REBT tells us that what we think about our selves, others, and the world we live in, is our version of what we think is true. The map is not the territory, the word is not the thing, they just represent what we think is real or true.

What others think of us is not us. Brain Bully thinking like ‘I’m dumb’ is a falsehood because I am not the word!

Stay tuned for presentation 3 of the ABC of REBT and Have a go Spaghettio! where we consider all that we’ve learned in presentation 1 and 2 and apply it in relation to the adventures of a particular book character, as we track and analyse what’s happening according to the ABC (and D and E!) of REBT!

Ms Smithers says, “Give it a try banana pie! Do your best, lemon zest!” 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grieving the Loss of Self When Narcissistic Feed Dries Up

Professor Sam Vaknin is an authority on narcissistic personality disorder. His videos are informative and well communicated which helped my understanding of this condition. A narcissists  'feed' dries up when the supply of others adulation and affirmation withers and stops. A crisis ensues when the narcissist realises that incoming approval has diminished and their idealised self is under attack. The contrived and carefully constructed 'self' is no longer acknowledged and valued by external sources. They cease 'to be' because the sources feeding their self sees through the narcissists grandiose and phony veneer. (see  Ms. Prudence Putty-Nose  ) The self they have concocted and which demands the positive regard and affirmation of those they have trained to adore them, is but an irrational virtual representation of the real world. There's a disparity between the narcissists version of reality and how things really are, projecting a world of fantasy replayed on...

APPROVALISM – the philosophy of the ‘love slob’

An approvalist is one who practices the philosophy of Approvalism. An approvalist lives life for the service of others seemingly without thought for self, ministering to the needs of others, making life ‘better’ for them. A good approvalist needs to do for others and her worth is measured according to how others view her and how helpful she can be to others. Approvalists say ‘yes’ to others demands and requests and are ultra sensitive to the needs of others (they must be rescued and saved). If they don’t perform to their own lofty expectations or (quelle catastrophe!) others don’t seem to value them (as they should) then they tend to harshly judge themselves as being ‘bad’ and may down themselves harshly! They will think, ‘I should have known that he needed support. I should have been there. I should have done better. I am a loser. It’s my fault he is in such a mess.’ They may also experience deep anger and direct it towards those ‘who do not appreciate me, after all shouldn’t they ...

Positive Psychology and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy

The ABC Theory of Emotional Disturbance illustrates how feelings and behaviour at C are determined by what happens at A and B i.e. what we believe (B) about what happens (A). This is an A+B=C philosophy. What happens when our constructed view of ourselves equates to an A=C way of believing e.g. failing at A makes me feel depressed at C and causes me to give up. An A=C philosophy ‘If I fail at A I feel really bad at C 'it' (A) makes me angry and sad’ is problematic for our less resilient kids because they are unaware that constructed beliefs at B have a lot to do with it! 
A is what happens e.g. 'someone has rejected me!' and C is how I feel and act in response to A e.g. 'I feel really sad because she has rejected me so I stay at home etc' The depth of despair and how long it lasts will depend on how self accepting the person is. If a child ‘needs’ the approval of others he/she is at risk of depression, anger, anxiety because...