If the 'map' (our belief constructions) isn’t
the 'territory' (reality) and people believe it is, then there’s a lot of unwarranted
emotional and behavioural upset endured by many who believe what they think is
reality.
This kind of thinking sees life’s twists
and turns as major inconveniences that shouldn’t happen. So, if, for example
someone doesn’t say thanks when you open the door for them, and you feel the
indignation rise within, and you say ‘you’re welcome’ after them, who or what
is causing your angst?
The answer is that you are! But
how? Rational Emotive behaviour Therapy, (REBT), the Stoics, General Semantics
and the Buddha say that how we interpret what’s happening has a connection to
our emotional and behavioural response. How we interpret what’s happening is
related to philosophical belief rules we’ve constructed over time, of which we
may not be aware.
Consider the scenario above, how might the aggrieved person be thinking at the time, about the incident. Possibly they surmise, ‘I did them a good turn and they didn’t acknowledge me. I always say thanks when people show me courtesy. That really pushes my buttons!’ The interpretation may be that because they didn’t say thanks, they were ‘being’ rude and it makes you angry! So, the other person ‘is’ rude and ‘made’ you angry.
What are the belief rules that
underly this type of assessment. REBT would say that irrational beliefs have
been established, constructed over time that determine this kind of appraisal
of the situation as follows.
-
People absolutely should/must treat me as I wish
to be treated.
-
People who behave badly are bad and deserve my
derision and contempt.
-
I can’t handle people not attending to my wants
and needs as I demand them to
-
It isn’t fair that I be inconvenienced this way.
Creator of REBT, Albert Ellis says
that the extent or severity of the persons upset in this instance is driven by
a ‘map’ replete with thinking inaccuracies that don’t approximate the
‘territory’ or how the real-world works. The map is considered to ‘be’ the ‘territory’
and the map’s not wrong, the territory is! In this case, what happened,
shouldn’t have and it has ‘made’ the person angry.
Donald Hoffman, cognitive scientist
accords with Alfered Korzybski, creator of General Semantics theory, saying that:
“Human
perception is not a window onto objective reality, but a ‘user interface’ that
presents the brain’s best, fitness-driven guess of the world.”
The Have a go Spaghettio! approach
to Success Helper (SH) thinking development, introduces the above ideas to
early childhood constructivists, who are formulating the ‘maps’ that best represents
the ‘territories’ they inhabit. SH thinking constitutes the virtual ‘map’ that
best represents the ‘territory’ and is embodied in the six SH capabilities
illustrated in the Have a Go Spaghettio! chart. It teaches young
constructivists that behaviour and emotions are connected to habits of
thinking, which can be Success Helper or Success Stopper, Brain Friend, or
Brain Bully.
Give it a try banana pie!

Comments
Post a Comment